Wisconsin
Bradley, then Karofsky to take over as chief justice on Wisconsin Supreme Court

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The next chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court will come from the liberal majority of justices, as the court announced Thursday that the conservative who currently holds the mostly honorary position will be replaced.
The change in leadership comes two days after voters elected Democratic-backed Susan Crawford to the court for a 10-year term that begins in August. Her victory over an opponent endorsed by President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk keeps the current 4-3 liberal majority on the court.
The seven justices vote on a chief justice every two years. The current chief justice, conservative Annette Ziegler, was elected to the post in 2021 and reelected in 2023 just before the court flipped to liberal control that August. Her current term as chief justice runs through the end of April.
She will be replaced first by Justice Ann Walsh Bradley for two months and then Justice Jill Karofsky for the remainder of the two-year term.
“I wish my colleagues all the best,” Ziegler said in a brief statement. “It has been my honor to serve as chief justice for the last four years.”
She will be replaced on May 1 by Bradley, a liberal who is retiring after 30 years on the bench. Her retirement created the open seat that Crawford won.
Bradley called it a “tremendous honor” to be able to serve as chief justice before retiring.
Bradley, whose retirement was recognized by Ziegler in open court on Thursday before oral arguments, will only hold the position for two months before being replaced by Karofsky. She will serve the remainder of the two-year term.
Karofsky, who was elected in 2020, promised to “work respectfully” with all members of the court. Justices have gotten into private arguments and vented at one another in sometimes heated written rulings.
“The people of Wisconsin have great faith in this Court, and I intend to be a Chief that increases the people’s confidence even further,” Karofsky said in a statement.
The chief justice has no additional voting power on the Supreme Court. However, the person who holds the title is the administrative head of the state’s judicial system and has administrative authority over to procedures adopted by the Supreme Court.
Justices were given the power to choose their own chief justice under a constitutional amendment approved by voters in 2015. Before the amendment, the longest-serving justice was automatically the chief.
Bradley is currently the longest-serving justice on the court and Ziegler, elected in 2007, is the second most senior.

Bill
April 3, 2025 at 4:06 pm
Did you notice that the AP in writing this story mentions “billionaire” Elon Musk, but not billionaire George Soros or the multimillionaire Illinois Governor who paid the freight for Susan Crawford?
Kevin
April 4, 2025 at 7:02 am
Bill – nailed it!
The election was bought! We all know it! The media, sadly this includes WIZM news staff, are inclined to commit sins of omission by calling out all the ‘sickening’ behavior of the monied republican party, but none of the ‘sickening’ behavior of the monied democrat party. When they are ‘forced’ to discuss the ‘sickening’ behavior of the monied democrat, they will always refer to that set of authoritarian command and control ne’er do wells as, philanthropists.
Finally, there is a quote in this article about how the citizens of Wisconsin have great faith in this court. I am not believing that line for a second. I don’t trust any of our court systems anymore! We have seen a minimum of 8 years of bullshite behavior out of the courts, federal supreme court justices that actually modify bills/laws so that they can be ‘legal’. SCOTUS decisions that openly declare they are based on ‘feelings’ and ’empathy’ as opposed to judicial review, that is how all states were ‘forced’ to accept homosexual marriage.
We will see what kind of hair brained, feeling/empathy-based rulings this court passes down. Not looking forward to it.
walden
April 5, 2025 at 3:22 pm
Follow the money. I would guess it was a pretty hefty income stream for WIZM to play all those anti-Schimel adds over and over again. We don’t want to make the Dem party angry by being fair do we?
In other news, I see Lee Enterprises (La Crosse Tribune parent company) is in play again. Hopefully new ownership will make a real newspaper out of it.
La Crosse Republican Party bears part of the blame for the media bias…they are seamingly AWOL.