MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin’s Republican-controlled Legislature took mere seconds Tuesday to reject Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ call to create a way for voters to get a chance to repeal the state’s 1849 abortion ban, even as Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson voiced support for letting the people decide the issue.
The Wisconsin Senate convened for all of 15 seconds, to gavel in and adjourn, the special session called by Evers to pass a constitutional amendment that would create a pathway for an up or down vote on the state’s abortion ban.
The Assembly, also controlled by Republicans, took about 20 seconds to dispense with Evers’ call, over howls of complaints from about a dozen Democratic lawmakers, some wearing T-shirts that said “Abortion is health care.”
The move by Evers is the latest by Democrats in the battleground state to turn the Nov. 8 election into a referendum on abortion.
This is the 11th time Republicans have gaveled in and out of a special session called by Evers.
Here is the list of prior ones:
- Reproductive Rights/Healthcare Access – June 22, 2022
- Surplus Plan – Tax Cut – March 8, 2022
- School Funding – K-12, Special Ed, UW System, Technical College – July 27, 2021
- Badger Care Expansion – May 25, 2021
- Unemployment Insurance Modernization – January 19, 2021
- Use of Force by Law Enforcement – August 31, 2020
- All Mail Spring Election and 7th CD Special Election – April 4, 2020
- K-12 School Funding – February 11, 2020
- Agriculture Funding – January 28, 2020
- Gun Violence – November 7, 202
Evers has repeatedly used the tactic of calling special sessions on hot-button political issues, including gun control and expanding Medicaid, updating the state’s unemployment system to put Republicans on the spot. They have never acted on any of the special session calls, including one in June to repeal the state’s abortion ban.
But Evers’ opponent Tim Michels, Johnson and other Republicans are focusing instead on crime and public safety in arguing that Democrats have failed to keep the state safe.
“What people want to talk about (is) reducing crime, they want to talk about reducing inflation, they want to talk about getting more money in their pocket and they want better schools in Wisconsin,” Michels said at a campaign stop in Baraboo, Wis., when asked for his reaction to the Legislature’s action.
A Marquette University Law School poll last month showed both the state’s governor and Senate races to be about even, while a majority of voters support abortion rights. That same poll also showed crime and public safety to be issues of high concern among voters.
Kansas voters in August rejected a ballot measure that would have allowed the Republican-controlled Legislature to tighten restrictions or ban abortion outright. Michigan voters will decide in November whether to put the right to an abortion into the state constitution.
“We should give the people an opportunity to vote on these important issues,” Evers said after the Legislature rejected his proposal. “The people of this state should have the right to take a stand at the ballot box. But true to form, Wisconsin Republicans have refused to act. That’s not leadership. And that’s certainly not democracy.”
Wisconsin clinics stopped performing abortions after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, as a legal fight plays out to determine whether the state’s 1849 abortion ban is in effect. evers’ opponent Michels repeatedly voiced support for the 1849 ban, which has no exceptions for rape and incest, during the Republican primary.
But last month, Michels reversed himself and said he would sign into law a bill granting exceptions for rape and incest.
Michels, at his campaign stop at the Square Tavern where he received the endorsement of the powerful Tavern League of Wisconsin, pledged to work with the Legislature on abortion-related issues.
Unlike other states, Wisconsin law does not allow voters or the Legislature to place referendums on the ballot.
Evers wanted the Legislature to approve a constitutional amendment that would allow voters to circulate petitions to place on the ballot proposals to reject laws passed by the Legislature and to enact new laws and constitutional amendments.
That could allow for a straight up or down vote on keeping the 1849 ban.
But Johnson came up with another approach Tuesday. He proposed a ballot measure with 10 possible answers that posed the question: “At what point does society have the responsibility to protect the life of an unborn child?” The options would range from the moment of conception to never.
Johnson did not say how he would get the question before voters, since it can’t be done now without a change to the constitution. He also did not address, or respond to a question seeking reaction, to the Legislature rejecting Evers’ plan that would have created a way to put before voters the questions Johnson wants answered.