fbpx
Connect with us

As I See It

Judges should judge the fact, not a book by its cover

Published

on

Who knew judges were so judgey? Judges are paid to determine guilt or innocence, but one former judge apparently likes to judge people over how they look. Former Wisconsin Supreme Court judge Michael Gableman is leading a taxpayer-funded investigation into Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election. After stonewalling for weeks, Gableman finally complied with a judge’s order that he release hundreds of documents which are a matter of public record related to his investigation. Turns out he is overly concerned with what people wear and what kind of animals they like. Documents show Gableman looked into the backgrounds of some primarily low-level elections workers such as Hannah Bubacz. Bubacz works in the IT department for Milwaukee and is being criticized for how she looks. The former Supreme Court justice wrote that he believes Bubacz is a democrat, because she plays video games, has a weird nose ring, loves nature and snakes and lives with her boyfriend but isn’t married to him. He also criticized the head of the Wisconsin Elections Commission over the way she dresses. It’s not clear why he is so concerned with how people look or dress, but judges should stick to judging the facts rather than trying to judge a book by its cover.

Scott Robert Shaw serves as WIZM Program Director and News Director, and delivers the morning news on WKTY, Z-93 and 95.7 The Rock. Scott has been at Mid-West Family La Crosse since 1989, and authors Wisconsin's only daily radio editorial, "As I See It" heard on WIZM each weekday morning and afternoon.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Kent Porter

    April 26, 2022 at 9:44 am

    Works on both side of the POLITICAL SPECTRUM , Judges should follow the LAW , Not their LIBERAL let em go ideology , Like Romona Gonzalas

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: